In this article, I will try to solve one particular aspect of the problem of the coherence of the Christian doctrine of Incarnation. I think that the attitude that just refuses to analyze the issue rationally and simply declares it a mystery is way too common. While I don't disagree that the Incarnation is mysterious in a profound sense, it does not follow that one cannot make any rational sense of it. Here's my attempt. To do so. I'm relying on certain ideas that I got from reading Thomas V. Morris, William Lane Craig, J. P. Moreland and Richard Swinburne on the subject, but I don't think that any of those authors present the exact same model that I do. As I focus on a particular aspect of the problem, I will take Morris' thorough argumentation on certain foundational issues in his book The Logic of the God Incarnate as more or less a given (thus I only summarize him on that point). But my contribution is perhaps a bit more original in the way that I build on this foundation, as well as the way that I use visual illustrations. (Though actually, on my first reading of Morris' book Our Idea of God, I thought that Morris intended to present the exact same model.)
Here's a link to the article:
The Relation of Christ’s Divine Mind to His Humanity: A Logically Coherent Model of the Incarnation
(Article hosted at Bukisa.com)
Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste individual essence. Näytä kaikki tekstit
Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste individual essence. Näytä kaikki tekstit
tiistai 16. joulukuuta 2008
Tilaa:
Blogitekstit (Atom)